An Analysis: Bit Off More Than He Could Chew

Hat tip to Boston Gal for pointing out an article in USA Today about homeowners who can barely afford their homes.

The person in question is Sydney Lasry of Severn, MD. After doing a public records search and checking Google Maps, I know where this guy lives and I can guess who his employer is. It’s not that hard since the US Government is one of the largest employers in the state of Maryland. (Apologies to Mr. Lasry for using him as an example. I don’t mean this as an attack on him. It’s more to further my understanding of the math surrounding mortgages and the mortgage crisis in America.)

With that in mind and some of the statistics in the article let us do a quick analysis.

1) He’s paying 70% of his gross pay towards housing.
2) His property tax bill is $3,200.00.
3) His insurance bill is $1,100.00
4) His home is $400K.
5) Guess: He works for the Federal government.
6) He is a ’systems engineer’. N.B. I put #5 before #6 for a reason to be explained.
7) The tax rate in his county is 89.1 cents per $100 of assessed value.

Alrighty. I have confirmed, his home’s sale price was $400K. His tax bill is actually closer to $3300, so I will adjust for that. Given 20% down and standard 30-year mortgage at 6.25%, per Bankrate.com’s calculator, his mortgage payment is principal and interest at $1969.80. His monthly escrow and insurance is 274.30 and 91.67 respectively. The total is $2335.77 per month in housing.

If that is 70% of his gross income. He’s making $40,041.80 a year.

Now here’s what does not add up about this at all.

That salary would make him a GS-6 or a GS-7. Now this is where it’s very weird that his title is ’systems engineer’. I am considered a systems engineer, but basically I write Oracle reports, making a very decent salary. My pay grade is more like a GS-11 and higher. But when I search USAJOBS for ’systems engineer’ at GS-6 to GS-12 in his neighborhood, I actually found a listing for an electronics engineer that is GS-5-GS-14, i.e. $33K to $104K a year. What kind of range is that?

So yes, it’s really crazy, but he could be making $40K a year in the DC Metro area as a systems engineer. It’s shocking to me, but I guess that’s what happens when you work as a civil employee.

Moving along, there was an assertion in the comments that even before the rise in his property taxes and insurance, he was paying 60% of his gross income to housing. My analysis shows that a mortgage payment of $1969.80 a month, by itself is 59% of his gross salary.

A lot of this analysis is contingent on the mortgage payment. I played it really conservatively and wrote that his mortgage was as traditional as possible, 20% down, 30 year fixed, reasonable rate. But I think that assumption was wrong. He’s paying PMI. So he probably put down less than 20%. What if he had really crappy credit? I ran the numbers again with a 30-year fixed at 9% and his gross salary is then $50K. Hm. I don’t know that I would have bought a $400K home while making only $50K a year. I mean, I was making about $45K a year when I bought my condo for under $200K. I just didn’t think I could afford a bigger home than that. And the bank didn’t think I could either. They pre-approved me for a mortgage around $190K.

So with that further information, I started running numbers at 5% down payment, same terms and rates as before (30-year fixed at 5%, 6.25%, 7.5% and 9%). The highest salary range I get is almost $60K. Now taking that number and punching into the mortgage affordability calculator, with $40K downpayment, and 5% rate, I see that he can afford a mortgage of $300,794.26. Now I’m starting to think this guy has a creative mortgage. I think he might have an interest-only ARM because I don’t know how he can afford to have this home whatsoever.

Ok. I’m done thinking here. But very fascinating stuff. This guy has a mortgage that he can barely afford right now. If he’s lucky, the assessment will fall and his tax bill is reduced. However, then he’ll be holding the bag on his place because the mortgage might be more than the home is worth. If he really does have an ARM, he’s toast.

I hope he has some roommates, because someone is going to have to pay for the electricity and cable bills around that place. (From what I can tell, his home is quite spacious and could handle a few extra people living there.)

Comments (8) left to “An Analysis: Bit Off More Than He Could Chew”

  1. PiggyBankBlues wrote:

    this is why i love math geeks :) mad props.

    the article is profoundly disturbing. i don’t know how people get suckered into thinking they can afford the bigger house, and i really don’t get how the lenders thought the same thing!

  2. Clever Dude wrote:

    4 years ago, I was about in this guy’s situation, but that was just my income. I also had Stacie’s income. We were around 6 figures combined, and we bought a 400k home. I’ve definitely pulled away in my salary, and Stacie has made marginal increases, but I can’t imagine buying our home with just my salary at the time. It would never have happened.

  3. ntguru wrote:

    I know the article says 70% of GROSS income going to housing but is that even possible? I mean, wouldn’t various fed/state/local/FICA taxes be 25-30% of gross effectively leaving him with $0? Slicing it another way they usually said during the lax credit years that 3-4 times your income is biggest mortgage you could get; this guy would be at EIGHT times his income. I just don’t think this is possible folks!

    I wonder if they meant 70% of NET income….which is still insane. That would peg his income around $60K which I think it a lot more plausible. That still puts his mortgage at more than 5 times income.

    Finally, you guys have nice property taxes out there! We pay 50% more on a home worth substantially less than his.

  4. mapgirl wrote:

    Ntguru - That’s funny you say that because MD has some of the highest property taxes in the DC area. I live in Virginia and I pay a lot less. I know that because my mortgage was written by a bank in MD, and their good faith estimate was double on the property taxes. My realtor thought the banker was plum crazy with those numbers.

    CleverDude - I know you are pretty solid in your thinking. You and your wife did a smart gamble with your mortgage know that you and your wife were going to substantially increase your incomes within 3 years.

  5. Mapgirl’s Fiscal Challenge / More Thoughts on Biting Off More Than He Could Chew wrote:

    […] As I reflect more and more on what happened to the guy in Maryland who can barely afford his housing costs as taxes and insurance costs rise, I am wondering how he got into this mess. […]

  6. ntguru wrote:

    MG, must be nice on the taxes! We actually live in an area that is desirable because its taxes are lower than those around it without any downsides!

    What are your thoughts on the gross versus net income? I just don’t think it could be 70% of gross.

  7. Single Ma wrote:

    I’m with ntguru, those numbers just don’t add up. I wonder if the editor for that article made a mistake.

  8. Money Links For 09-21-07: Death Special wrote:

    […] An Analysis: Bit Off More Than He Could Chew by Mapgirl @ Mapgirl’s Fiscal Challenge. […]

Post a Comment

*Required
*Required (Never published)