Numeric Observations
Today, 80 blogs are linked to me. That’s a nice round number.
My heavy on the religion post about Lent this week was post number 666. That makes me chuckle and no, it was not planned at all.
It’s a math geek thing to look at the significance of numbers. I’m not one of those crazy numerology types. I don’t read into numbers and find mystical messages. I’m going to go see that movie ‘23′ because I don’t really like horror films. (Though I might if it’s mostly suspense without gore and the reviews are good.)
I’m kind of bummed I’m going to be hosting the 90th Carnival of Personal Finance in two weeks. I seriously thought I was going to be 91, which is a prime number. Though 90 factors down to 3 x 3 x 2 x 5.
Msminiducky wrote:
Huh, weird, I was just thinking about your subscriber number just now because I’ve just started playing with Bloglines. Yep, I’m Asian, btw
Posted on 22-Feb-07 at 11:44 am | Permalink
TMac wrote:
Maybe you should check out the new Jim Carey movie, Number 23. Looks kind of weird, but good at the same time!
Posted on 22-Feb-07 at 3:50 pm | Permalink
Clever Dude wrote:
You’re such a geek
Posted on 22-Feb-07 at 6:51 pm | Permalink
Golbguru wrote:
Why do you love prime numbers so much? No factors mean mental division becomes complicated.
Btw, 91 = 7 x 13 ..not a prime, so you are not really missing much.
Posted on 24-Feb-07 at 10:26 pm | Permalink
mapgirl wrote:
Golbguru - Good catch! Now I know who to ask to review my math… I’m working on a killer spreadsheet tonight for fun and games. (Bored at my parents house.)
Posted on 24-Feb-07 at 11:31 pm | Permalink