<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Is Style Only for the Upper Class?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/</link>
	<description>Just tidbits about money and finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:18:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sankari</title>
		<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/comment-page-1/#comment-9321</link>
		<dc:creator>sankari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 02:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/#comment-9321</guid>
		<description>&quot;Style editors&quot; need to change their title to &quot;merchandising editors&quot;  -they dont seem to identify a trend anymore - event the text that accompanies the images and products are simply copied verbatim from the manufacturers advertising speil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Style editors&#8221; need to change their title to &#8220;merchandising editors&#8221;  -they dont seem to identify a trend anymore &#8211; event the text that accompanies the images and products are simply copied verbatim from the manufacturers advertising speil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plonkee</title>
		<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/comment-page-1/#comment-8980</link>
		<dc:creator>plonkee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/#comment-8980</guid>
		<description>Being English and so living in a pretty class-ridden society, I&#039;d say that in general style is not something for the upper classes (think Princess Anne).

But thats because I&#039;m middle class (in an British sense - separate from wealth) and English Major is right, style is a function of status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being English and so living in a pretty class-ridden society, I&#8217;d say that in general style is not something for the upper classes (think Princess Anne).</p>
<p>But thats because I&#8217;m middle class (in an British sense &#8211; separate from wealth) and English Major is right, style is a function of status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-03-02 âˆž Get Rich Slowly</title>
		<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/comment-page-1/#comment-8979</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-03-02 âˆž Get Rich Slowly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/#comment-8979</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mapgirlâ€™s Fiscal Challenge / â€œIs Style Only for the Upper Class?â€? (tags: style class) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for March 2nd, 2007 &#187; The Bargain Queen</title>
		<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/comment-page-1/#comment-8961</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for March 2nd, 2007 &#187; The Bargain Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/#comment-8961</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] â€œIs Style Only for the Upper Class?â€? If the style pages only show the rich and well-connected, are they the only ones who have style? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Major</title>
		<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/comment-page-1/#comment-8522</link>
		<dc:creator>English Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/#comment-8522</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between the idea that &quot;style=money&quot; (nope) and the idea of style as a function of status (which I&#039;d say is almost categorically true).  It&#039;s not merely a matter of access (i.e., it&#039;s possible to get stylish clothing on a tight budget, though realistically, it&#039;s harder and takes a great deal more time), it&#039;s a matter of &lt;i&gt;codes&lt;/i&gt;.  The ability to &quot;read&quot; style is a learned one--much like the ability to figure out what an abstract painting is about.  The ability to put together clothing in a way that reads as stylish to others (tastemaking others) is similarly coded, contingent on one&#039;s assimilation of the code.  As codes go, the code of clothing style is a reasonably accessible one, given the prevalence of fashion and style in the media, but I &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; think that, as in other things, status (and thus, money) are factors in style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between the idea that &#8220;style=money&#8221; (nope) and the idea of style as a function of status (which I&#8217;d say is almost categorically true).  It&#8217;s not merely a matter of access (i.e., it&#8217;s possible to get stylish clothing on a tight budget, though realistically, it&#8217;s harder and takes a great deal more time), it&#8217;s a matter of <i>codes</i>.  The ability to &#8220;read&#8221; style is a learned one&#8211;much like the ability to figure out what an abstract painting is about.  The ability to put together clothing in a way that reads as stylish to others (tastemaking others) is similarly coded, contingent on one&#8217;s assimilation of the code.  As codes go, the code of clothing style is a reasonably accessible one, given the prevalence of fashion and style in the media, but I <i>do</i> think that, as in other things, status (and thus, money) are factors in style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debt Hater</title>
		<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/comment-page-1/#comment-8416</link>
		<dc:creator>Debt Hater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/#comment-8416</guid>
		<description>When you look at magazines with names like In Style, the stuff they talk about isn&#039;t for the thrifty and, ironically, it&#039;s not for people with a &quot;distinctive manner of expression.&quot; It&#039;s for people who want to look like someone else and how much money they&#039;d have to spend to do it. It&#039;s about copying, not celebrating uniqueness... unless you can afford to be unique with a $500 pair of shoes.
So, by definition, style has nothing to do with money, but the purveyors of all things stylish sometimes forget that. Or, they don&#039;t think about it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you look at magazines with names like In Style, the stuff they talk about isn&#8217;t for the thrifty and, ironically, it&#8217;s not for people with a &#8220;distinctive manner of expression.&#8221; It&#8217;s for people who want to look like someone else and how much money they&#8217;d have to spend to do it. It&#8217;s about copying, not celebrating uniqueness&#8230; unless you can afford to be unique with a $500 pair of shoes.<br />
So, by definition, style has nothing to do with money, but the purveyors of all things stylish sometimes forget that. Or, they don&#8217;t think about it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clever Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/comment-page-1/#comment-8397</link>
		<dc:creator>Clever Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mapgirl.net/mfc/2007/02/19/is-style-only-for-the-upper-class/#comment-8397</guid>
		<description>The only part of any style section I&#039;ve read in the paper is the comics back home in PA. The rest does always seem written for high-class people, even in Pennsyltuckey where there are very few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only part of any style section I&#8217;ve read in the paper is the comics back home in PA. The rest does always seem written for high-class people, even in Pennsyltuckey where there are very few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
